-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/15 04:35, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
[...snip...]
> Thu Jun 4 22:23:45 2015 setgid('nobody') failed: Operation not
> permitted (errno=1)
Hi,
I'm just so puzzled by this error message. Can you please do these
two commands and provide the
Hi,
David Sommerseth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/06/15 04:35, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
> [...snip...]
>
>> Thu Jun 4 22:23:45 2015 setgid('nobody') failed: Operation not
>> permitted (errno=1)
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just so puzzled by this error mess
David--
On 06/05/2015 06:06 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/15 04:35, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
[...snip...]
Thu Jun 4 22:23:45 2015 setgid('nobody') failed: Operation not
permitted (errno=1)
Hi,
I'm just so puzzled by this error messag
JJK--
On 06/05/2015 10:36 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
I agree with David... seems like Synology screwed something up
OTOH, this is not a big security issue - openvpn will safely run
without 'group nobody' .
Thanks, JJK
I have written the tech support people again conveying your misgivi
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
> OTOH, if this is screwed up, might there be some other bug that could
> affect operations or security of this production nas? I worry
Of course there could be bugs overall :-) - but generally speaking, if
they did no
On 06/05/2015 11:10 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote:
OTOH, if this is screwed up, might there be some other bug that could
affect operations or security of this production nas? I worry
Of course there could be bugs overall :
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:43:39 +0200
> From: Gert Doering
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] any way to get local network details to
> flow through to the server?
> To: Jason Haar
> Cc: "openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
>
> Message-ID: <20150602214339.gc...@greenie.muc.de>
> Con
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:49:48AM -0500, jack seth wrote:
> > (As a side note, you're screwed in any case if the hotel gateway happens
> > to use an ip address also used by one of your servers - but to fix *that*,
> > you'd have to go down the "use NAT on the server tun" route...)
>
>
> Can
