Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Am 23.10.2015 um 19:29 schrieb Selva Nair: > ... > > It is just one thing to avoid. The postal service would frown on you > having the same house number as a house on the other end of the street > even if your house is empty :-( > > > Why think the client is not Unisys or someone au

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Selva Nair
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi JJK > > Am 23.10.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Jan Just Keijser: > > Hi, > > > ... > > > > > As for the strange subnet: I've seen many companies that abuse public IP > > space for their own internal networks. Provided that you get your > > routing+n

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Selva Nair
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:48:34PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > > I've just read the entire thread and the original "bug report" from the > > IT department - there's a lot of information that is missing. > > Can they rule out eit

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:48:34PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > I've just read the entire thread and the original "bug report" from the > IT department - there's a lot of information that is missing. > Can they rule out either OpenVPN or the Konica Minolta thing? [..] > OpenVPN nor printe

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi JJK Am 23.10.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Jan Just Keijser: > Hi, > ... > > As for the strange subnet: I've seen many companies that abuse public IP > space for their own internal networks. Provided that you get your > routing+natting right, this does not necessarily have to ben an issue. > I've

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread David Raison
Hi all, Thanks for all the suggestions! I would be very happy to be able to supply more information, but we neither have direct access to their infrastructure, nor do they seem to be able or willing to supply the information we requested. So at this point, I cannot, unfortunately supply more inf

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Jan Just Keijser
Hi, On 23/10/15 12:04, David Raison wrote: > > On 23/10/15 11:41, Erich Titl wrote: Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, >> No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. > Granted. I can always suggest they change that, but not sure they will > actually be willing to change this.

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Am 23.10.2015 um 12:04 schrieb David Raison: > > > On 23/10/15 11:41, Erich Titl wrote: Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, >> No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. > Granted. I can always suggest they change that, but not sure they will > actually be willing to cha

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread David Raison
On 23/10/15 11:41, Erich Titl wrote: >> > Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, > No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. Granted. I can always suggest they change that, but not sure they will actually be willing to change this. But maybe they should and we might see that it mir

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Am 23.10.2015 um 09:27 schrieb David Raison: > > > On 23/10/15 02:17, Erich Titl wrote: >> Why do you think so? >> 192.60.28.0 belongs to Unisys > > Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. and mentioned as > much, but how would this i

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-23 Thread David Raison
On 23/10/15 02:17, Erich Titl wrote: > Why do you think so? > 192.60.28.0 belongs to Unisys Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, and mentioned as much, but how would this influence the openvpn and printer spooler issue at hand? They've been using that subnet for years now and the

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-22 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Am 22.10.2015 um 18:34 schrieb David Raison: ... > > The client itself, as well as any other devices on the local network are > in a (somewhat weird) subnet of 192.60.28.0/24, so there shouldn't be > any conflict here. Why do you think so? 192.60.28.0 belongs to Unisys cheers ET ---

Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-22 Thread Doug Lytle
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:34 PM, David Raison da...@tentwentyfour.lu wrote: >>> But maybe I'm lucky and anyone has already seen a similar issue? I have not seen this and we do have several Minolta printers. But, as a habit, I usually disable auto-discover on our Windows 7 Clients. Doug

[Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spooler conflict

2015-10-22 Thread David Raison
Good day, Here's a case that I doubt anyone has seen yet, but I might just as well give it a try. I will add more information as I'll be able to gather it. The setup is as follows: We have a Windows 7 client running both an OpenVPN client and another Application. That other application connects