On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Leroy Tennison
wrote:
> A couple of thoughts come to mind. First, if node 254 is always active
> then "well-behaved" DHCP clients should test for that and never accept
> that address.
>
All this dhcp thing is just an exchange between the TAP interface and the
DH
A couple of thoughts come to mind. First, if node 254 is always active
then "well-behaved" DHCP clients should test for that and never accept
that address. Second, if OpenVPN is using that address then hopefully
the developers had enough foresight to prevent it from passing out that
address.
