Hi,
I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share
option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and
man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since,
well, ever, really. NetBSD and FreeBSD have both had MSG_NOS
Resent as didn't arrive first time.
Hi,
I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share
option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and
man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since,
well, ever, really. Net
James Yonan wrote:
Stephen Borrill wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the
port-share option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability
in the source and man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom
have been in BSD si
Could the configuration file format be extended to allow inclusion of
relevant certs and keys in-line? e.g. instead of "ca ca.crt" and then
having a separate file, you have something like:
dev tun
proto udp
remote server 1194
ca-inline
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
[snip]
-END CERTIFICATE
