Hi OpenVPN Devel..
As promised ;) I'm now subscribed to the OpenVPN devel list.
So if you need me for any questions related to PolarSSL, just mail..
Regards,
Paul Bakker
Maintainer PolarSSL (http://polarssl.org)
On 6-2-2012 8:22, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> as David mentioned: is BlowFish support finished ;) ?
Almost! :)..
> my wiki page on comparing OpenSSL vs NSS vs GnuTLS vs PolarSSL when
> used in Curl can be found here:
>
> http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/projects/grid/gridwiki/index.php/Funny_Curly_thing
Hey guys,
So I just got word that they actually successfully made a video of my
talk on FOSDEM. So that will be published soon on video.fosdem.org I guess..
I want to apologize upfront for any misrepresentation I did on your
part. In order to get my point across, I can be more negative on aspects
I'd go for >= 1.1.4
Since 1.1.2 does not handle empty packets correctly.
On 7-6-2012 11:35, Frank de Brabander wrote:
> Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a
> security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL
> 1.1.1.
>
> On 07-06-12 11:24, "S
Agreed as well..
On 7-6-2012 11:42, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36
>> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support
On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"?
1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro!
>
> (How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like
> to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslav
