Re: [Openvpn-devel] Separate apt repositories for 2.4-alpha/beta/rc releases?

2016-10-15 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 14.10.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Steffan Karger: > > On 14 Oct 2016 9:14 p.m., "Matthias Andree" > wrote: > > > > Am 14.10.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Samuli Seppänen: > > > > Would 2.3.12 -> 2.4-alpha1 be too big an upgrade? > > > > > Yes, definitely. Please create a separa

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Separate apt repositories for 2.4-alpha/beta/rc releases?

2016-10-15 Thread David Sommerseth
On 15/10/16 11:01, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 14.10.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Steffan Karger: >> >> On 14 Oct 2016 9:14 p.m., "Matthias Andree" > > wrote: >> > >> > Am 14.10.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Samuli Seppänen: >> >> > > Would 2.3.12 -> 2.4-alpha1 be too big an upgrade

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Separate apt repositories for 2.4-alpha/beta/rc releases?

2016-10-15 Thread Steffan Karger
On 15 October 2016 at 12:11, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 15/10/16 11:01, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Am 14.10.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Steffan Karger: >>> >>> On 14 Oct 2016 9:14 p.m., "Matthias Andree" >> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Am 14.10.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Samuli Seppän

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Separate apt repositories for 2.4-alpha/beta/rc releases?

2016-10-15 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 15.10.2016 um 12:11 schrieb David Sommerseth: > b) Have the package exclude each other to block both being installed >at the same time. That's the path normally chosen and that I'd recommend for DEB/APT-based packages because solvers can usually figure that part out. I think the RPM world n