Hi all,
hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ...
>
>
> […]
>
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production" phas
Hi
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:45:52PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> uhoh: https://sweet32.info/
>>
>> shall we change the default cipher in the master tree to AES-256 (if not
>> done so already) ?
>
>
[…]
> OTOH, what we could do is: indeed *change+ the default, and add a big fat
> wa
Hi,
On 30 August 2016 at 09:01, Jens Neuhalfen wrote:
>> OTOH, what we could do is: indeed *change+ the default, and add a big fat
>> warning ("you have not specified a --cipher directive. The default has
>> been changed from 2.3 to 2.4, so please ensure your config matches the
>> other end" or
>> With that in mind, if shipping a patched pkcs11-helper in Windows
>> makes your life easier I'd consider doing this. But step carefully,
>> avoid getting in a situation where you suddenly have to maintain these
>> patches yourself. Rather try to see what Fedora does and see if that
>> can be
Am 30.08.16 um 09:42 schrieb Steffan Karger:
> Hi,
>
> On 30 August 2016 at 09:01, Jens Neuhalfen
> wrote:
>>> OTOH, what we could do is: indeed *change+ the default, and add a big fat
>>> warning ("you have not specified a --cipher directive. The default has
>>> been changed from 2.3 to 2.4,
On 30 August 2016 at 00:41, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production" phase March
> 2017, OpenVPN have generally s
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:03:00PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> -std=c89
>Makes the LZ4 library we're shipping explode.
We could fix that, but right now the LZ4 sources are "very close to
upstream" (just a few file and #include renames) so that would make
comparison "are these sane s
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 11:11 +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
> >> With that in mind, if shipping a patched pkcs11-helper in Windows
> >> makes your life easier I'd consider doing this. But step carefully,
> >> avoid getting in a situation where you suddenly have to maintain these
> >> patches your
So, following changes are required for V3:
1) No drop_if_recursive() call for P2P
2) Same for TAP
3) Add an option to disable it
Sounds reasonable?
2016-08-24 16:13 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:12:54AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> > may I suggest to make th
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:12:17PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'm accumulating a torture test suite (which I expect OpenVPN to fail) at
> http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openconnect.git/blob/HEAD:/tests/Makefile.am
Torture test suites are good :-) - Steffan regularily tries to beat
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:59:52PM +0300, Lev Stipakov wrote:
> So, following changes are required for V3:
>
> 1) No drop_if_recursive() call for P2P
Well, sort of. It's useful in p2p mode as well, but it needs to check
if we already know the remote address before trying to read via the
poi
11 matches
Mail list logo
