[Openvpn-devel] On defaulting the GUI to run as administrator

2015-12-12 Thread Selva Nair
continuing from the -users list thread Ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.user/36387/focus=36417 Hi, I have posted a pull request to openvpn-gui with a one line patch. It just requests the highest Privilege from invoking user, and leaves the manifest embedded. This means, when an

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Pass adapter index to up/down scripts

2015-12-12 Thread Lev Stipakov
Trac #637 Signed-off-by: Lev Stipakov --- src/openvpn/init.c | 18 ++ src/openvpn/misc.c | 6 ++ src/openvpn/misc.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/openvpn/init.c b/src/openvpn/init.c index 179c7ef..b0c0e26 100644 --- a/src/openvpn/init.c +++ b/

[Openvpn-devel] Options that are "safe" for users to modify?

2015-12-12 Thread Jonathan K. Bullard
Inspired by Gert, I am considering adding a new feature to Tunnelblick (FOSS GUI for OpenVPN on OS X) and would like your reactions. In an earlier thread on openvpn-users, my original more grandiose idea was (with good reason) NAKed. It was also suggested that openvpn-devel was a better place for t

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Options that are "safe" for users to modify?

2015-12-12 Thread Arne Schwabe
Am 12.12.15 um 22:47 schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard: > Inspired by Gert, I am considering adding a new feature to Tunnelblick > (FOSS GUI for OpenVPN on OS X) and would like your reactions. In an > earlier thread on openvpn-users, my original more grandiose idea was > (with good reason) NAKed. It was

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Options that are "safe" for users to modify?

2015-12-12 Thread Jonathan K. Bullard
Hi. On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Arne Schwabe wrote: > Might not really be related to this but have looked into the work that > provides the certificates and keys via the managment console? We have > even have a contrib program that gets certificates from the Mac OS X > keychain and provides

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Options that are "safe" for users to modify?

2015-12-12 Thread Selva Nair
Hi, On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard wrote: > > My tentative plan is to allow users to update without authorization > any files that are the "targets" of the following options: > I suppose, not just adding but also removing options will be allowed. There could be more option