Hi,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:59:02AM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> FWIW: Now I also got to test git master with what I wanted to in the
> first place, namely to see whether or not all the nice dualstack changes
> had also made "multihome" work for IPv4-mapped clients coming in to the
> server on
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> In case you want to test yourself, the code is appended.
... it was not. As always when people say "I have attached..." :-/
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
The code in link_socket_write_udp_posix_sendmsg() for the IP_RECVDESTADDR
case was sending a too-large control message (sizeof openvpn_pktinfo,
which is a union for IPv4+IPv6) instead of just openvpn_in4_pktinfo,
leading to sendmsg() refusing to send the packet.
Use RFC 2292 macros for alignment +
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> In case you want to test yourself, the code is appended. It's not pretty,
> but gets the job done :-)
Here's the latest iteration of the code. The changes compared to
openvpn's socket.c are actually bigger than I expected, as w