Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I was wondering about this as well. This makes it extremely hard to
every change the cipher (i.e. if it's not considered "safe" anymore)
It needs to be implemented, tested, etc. - and I'm not sur
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> It should be possible to add negotiation without completely breaking
> backwards compatibility; right now, when a server pushes an option to
> the client that is unrecognized the client will print a warning but it
> will no
Hi Gert,
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
It should be possible to add negotiation without completely breaking
backwards compatibility; right now, when a server pushes an option to
the client that is unrecognized the client will prin
