-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/10 20:27, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for you patch! In general, it very looks good. Can you
>> elaborate a little bit on how you have tested this patch?
>
> I've been using it on my client machines for the last few months.
> This
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:54:08PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> The average user might have hits between 1 and 5 IP addresses
> (guestimate) on such a hostname lookups. There are a few things I am
> concerned about in this regards. Even though on my platform in_addr_t
> only needs 4 byte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/02/10 13:53, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:54:08PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> The average user might have hits between 1 and 5 IP addresses
>> (guestimate) on such a hostname lookups. There are a few things I a
Hi,
Re: [PATCH] Change verify-cn so cn is no longer hardcoded in openvpn's config
file
This patch should be easy to process.
A resubmission of the patch sent to this list on 04/23/2009.
The patch changes the verify-cn script sample
to be used with --tls-verify so that instead of having
to hard
---
sample-scripts/verify-cn | 42 +++---
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sample-scripts/verify-cn b/sample-scripts/verify-cn
index 5d56d95..f9fea0f 100755
--- a/sample-scripts/verify-cn
+++ b/sample-scripts/verify-cn
@@ -7,24
On 02/18/2010 08:12:17 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/02/10 13:53, Gert Doering wrote:
> >> * usage of get_random in getaddr() [socket.c:261]
> >>
> >> I admit I should have spotted this one on the first review.
> Because
> >> this code snippet below looks really odd to me.
> >>
> >> if (n
On 02/18/2010 12:26:37 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> (I seem to recall that bind attempts to rotate the ordering
> of the names, but I can't find any reference to this at a glance
> and could be wrong.)
Ah, here it is. Bind9 has a rrset-order directive. Results can
be fixed, random, or cyclic but
Hi guys,
If we have time in today's meeting, we could discuss how to organize
testing for OpenVPN. For example, how to be (reasonably) sure that a new
piece of code has been tested by enough people before it ends up in
"stable". A couple of things come to mind... first, I think it would be
benefic
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:58:27AM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Re: [PATCH] Change verify-cn so cn is no longer hardcoded in openvpn's config
> file
ACK from my end. The code looks sane and I can see the usefulness.
(Backwards compatibility would be very easy to add - "if the argument does
ACK.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:58:28, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> ---
> sample-scripts/verify-cn | 42 +++---
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sample-scripts/verify-cn b/sample-scripts/verify-cn
> index 5d56d95..f9fea0f 100755
> -
From: David Sommerseth
Based on a discussion on the mailing list and in the IRC meeting Feb 18,
it was decided to remove get_random() from the getaddr() function as that
can conflict with round-robin/randomization done by DNS servers.
This change must be documented in the release notes.
Signed-
Hi,
ACK for the idea, but this...
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:23:48PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> - /* choose address randomly, for basic load-balancing capability */
> - ia.s_addr = *(in_addr_t *) (h->h_addr_list[get_random () % n]);
> + ia.s_addr = *(in_addr_t
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:46 PM, JuanJo Ciarlante wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, David Sommerseth
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Greetings all!
>>
>> I am now announcing the openvpn-testing.git tree as open. Gert has
>> already been
How is -devel being numbered, and how are we handling snapshots for propagation
of -devel versions? I've spoken with Matthias Andree, the FreeBSD port
maintainer, and he'll be handing maintainership to me for openvpn-devel
(possibly openvpn, later) after the ports freeze.
Should I be taking
14 matches
Mail list logo
