Any news?
On 9/27/08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I prefer to receive patches...
> Anyway, this is not exactly what I meant.
> Please review latest head.
> I did not test this, but it should be correct now as far as the
> changes are concerned.
> It may not work as the validation process
On 10/7/08, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Thanks for reviving this. I built it and tried it and seems to work.
> I didn't test with revoked or expired certificates, however.
>
> As for warnings there's just a trivial one:
> cryptoapi.c:429: warning: passing arg 2 of `d2i_X509' from
>
Hi,
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 9/27/08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I prefer to receive patches...
>> Anyway, this is not exactly what I meant.
>> Please review latest head.
>> I did not test this, but it should be correct now as far as the
>> changes are concerned.
>> It may not work as the valid
Faidon,
If you send me a binary build for Windows 32-bit, I'll test it against expired
and revoked certs. I presume I don't need a server configured for this test;
it should fail client side before attempting to connect?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Faidon Liambotis [mailto:parav...
Binaries are at [1].
It is not enough to test it on client, we need to verify that the
validation works correctly on both ends, as capi has different policy
for servers and clients.
Alon.
[1] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/openvpn-mscapi-test-1.tar.bz2
On 10/7/08, Jason R. Coombs wrote:
>
