On 10/18/05, Michael Renner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First - thanks for OpenVPN, this is by far one of the most hassle-free
> opensource VPN solutions out there.
>
> But there seems to be a problem (or undocumented behaviour?) when using
> username-as-common-name in combination with concurrent sessions wi
On 2005-10-16, James Yonan wrote:
> * Merged --multihome patch.
Any chance to merge the IPv6 patch of JuanJo Ciarlante in the current
2.1-series, too? http://www.irrigacion.gov.ar/juanjo/openvpn/
Regards,
Bernhard
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On 2005-10-16, James Yonan wrote:
>
> > * Merged --multihome patch.
>
> Any chance to merge the IPv6 patch of JuanJo Ciarlante in the current
> 2.1-series, too? http://www.irrigacion.gov.ar/juanjo/openvpn/
That patch is currently merged into the 2
I'm looking for a solution to a problem with small amounts of packet
loss thru Openvpn tunnel, and I think the root cause may be some sort of
subtle bug in Openvpn. It appears to be dropping small packets - such as
those that result from fragmenting larger frames for
crypto/encapsulation - as
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Mike Ireton wrote:
> I have recently been able to observe this situation first hand with
> tcpdump running at the OpenVPN server and client sides. I saw frames go
> into the tunnel that _did not_ make it out the other side. Worse yet, it
> appeared that the frames not makin
