Hi,
(This is a re-post from the -users list, thought it might be more
appropriate here)
Exactly what kind of information does OpenVPN keep track of for active
VPN sessions? (after the authentication process is finished)
Reason for asking;
OpenVPN supports load-balancing trough the use of round
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Magne J. Andreassen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (This is a re-post from the -users list, thought it might be more
> appropriate here)
>
> Exactly what kind of information does OpenVPN keep track of for active
> VPN sessions? (after the authentication process is finished)
See struct con
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:20 -0600, James Yonan wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Magne J. Andreassen wrote:
>
> > Exactly what kind of information does OpenVPN keep track of for active
> > VPN sessions? (after the authentication process is finished)
>
> See struct context in openvpn.h -- this is the m
Marcelo Toledo wrote:
We have tested it in two ways:
1. Applied only in the server, worked perfectly with 3 clients. Right
now we're going to try few hundreds.
2. Applied the patch only in the client, worked well but they couldn't
see each other.
Should I apply in both or only in the server i
Em Sex, 2005-10-07 às 18:19 +0200, Rolf Fokkens escreveu:
>
> Could be a silly question, but to be sure: you had the client-to-client
> option enabled on the server side?
Yes we do.
> The patch should work both on the client and the server, but for clients
> it hardly does anything at all.
alr
Marcelo Toledo wrote:
Em Sex, 2005-10-07 às 18:19 +0200, Rolf Fokkens escreveu:
Could be a silly question, but to be sure: you had the client-to-client
option enabled on the server side?
Yes we do.
The patch should work both on the client and the server, but for clients
it hardly
On 10/7/05, Marcelo Toledo wrote:
> Em Sex, 2005-10-07 às 18:19 +0200, Rolf Fokkens escreveu:
> >
> > Could be a silly question, but to be sure: you had the client-to-client
> > option enabled on the server side?
>
> Yes we do.
>
> > The patch should work both on the client and the server, but for
Marcelo Toledo wrote:
In the main server we installed the patch. We have ~400 clients
connected to it, 3 of them we also installed the patch, here is the
result.
All these 3 clients couldn't see each other but they could see the
remaining 397 clients. The 397 couldn't see the 3 clients.
I thin
