-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Unfortunately, I think we are late :(
Well, that's sad.
> I'm a bit worried that this project might never happen because:
>
> (a) Open source developers who are motivated by working on cool,
> intellectually stimulating projects may not want to j
> > > The main change to the OpenVPN protocol is that when "ifconfig" is
> > > "pushed" to the client, it pushes an address and a subnetmask, instead
> > > of two addresses. (It already does this for dev==tap, so it isn't a
> > > big deal).
>
> This is my key point. The client needs to be told t
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> James Yonan wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Pawel Pokrywka wrote:
> >
> >
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>Google organizes contest, see:
> >>
> >>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> >
> >
> > Unfor
On Sunday June 5, j...@yonan.net wrote:
>
> I don't think it's possible for the current TAP-Win32 driver to do OSI
> Layer 3 with a network/netmask setting. This gets back to the same reason
> why --ifconfig-pool-linear doesn't work on Windows: The TAP-Win32 driver
> is a TAP driver from the
> First, in this matter of a TAP driver for win 9x, i have to say
> that they aren't as dead as everyone might think. In countries that are
> in development or more poor, win 9x are the majority, The complications
> that come with winxp (bugs, worms, etc...) and the hardware that it
> requires are
