James Yonan wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
James Yonan wrote:
I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not
saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that.
The correct statement which works around the Mandrake 10.1 problem would be:
=
James Yonan wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
As long as we are on the subject of "Requires" in the openvpn.spec file,
shouldn't there also be a:
Requires: bridge-utils >= 0.9.7
Why is this required? What if you are not bridging?
James
Ok, my view on an RPM is that the pack
James Yonan wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
James Yonan wrote:
I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not
saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that.
The correct statement which works around the Mandrake 10.1 problem would be:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> James Yonan wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>As long as we are on the subject of "Requires" in the openvpn.spec file,
> >>shouldn't there also be a:
> >>
> >>Requires: bridge-utils >= 0.9.7
> >
> >
> > Why is this required? Wh
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> James Yonan wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>James Yonan wrote:
> >>
> I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not
> saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that.
>
> >>>
James Yonan wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
James Yonan wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote:
James Yonan wrote:
I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not
saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that.
The correct stat
