Re: [Openvpn-devel] Openvpn for RH62 - eek!

2003-05-02 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
IMHO init scripts must be POSIX (Bourne?) compliant. They should work in bash, ksh, whateversh, and don't depend on the administrator's will to install one or another. i.e. I'll say this: if [ $errors == 1 ]; then is better this way: if [ $errors -eq 1 ]; then And this:

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Openvpn for RH62 - eek!

2003-05-02 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > Anyway, I'm attaching Debian's init.d script in case you want to take a > look at it. > Doh! I ALWAYS forget to attach files! Sorry :) -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up essential liberty agi@(agi.a

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Openvpn for RH62 - eek!

2003-05-02 Thread Matthias Andree
On Fri, 02 May 2003, James Yonan wrote: > How do most other initialization scripts handle the differences between bash 1 > and 2? Do they just restrict themselves to the least common denominator (a)? Yes. /bin/sh is standardized; Solaris for some strange reason ship b0rked year-old stuff though

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Fwd: Re: comp-lzo and licensing issues

2003-05-02 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > Sorry for the huge forward, but everything needed to understand this > problem should be there :) FYI: My post of the FreeBSD-ports mailing list how I should handle this license issue LZO <-> OpenSSL hasn't turned up anything in some days; s