Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc3 released

2007-04-25 Thread James Yonan
Carsten Krüger wrote: Hello James, On Vista x64, my understanding is that the TAP driver would need to be signed by Microsoft themselves. wrong Digital Signatures for Kernel Modules on x64-based Systems Running Windows Vista http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/64bit/kmsigni

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc3 released

2007-04-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 4/23/07, James Yonan wrote: This release should fix all known Vista issues, on both x86 and x64, however the TAP driver will not install on Vista x64 unless driver signing enforcement is disabled. I've also added the excellent OpenVPN GUI (Mathias Sundman version) as a Windows install option

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc3 released

2007-04-23 Thread Carsten Krüger
Hello James, > On Vista x64, my understanding is that the TAP driver > would need to be signed by Microsoft themselves. wrong Digital Signatures for Kernel Modules on x64-based Systems Running Windows Vista http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/64bit/kmsigning.mspx How to Obtain a Softw

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc3 released

2007-04-23 Thread James Yonan
Serge Wautier wrote: Hi James, * The Windows Installer and TAP driver are now signed by OpenVPN Solutions LLC (in addition to the usual GnuPG signatures). What kind (purpose) of signature is this? Does this mean that Windows won't reject the driver anymore during installation?

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc3 released

2007-04-22 Thread Serge Wautier
Hi James, > * The Windows Installer and TAP driver are now signed by > OpenVPN Solutions LLC (in addition to the usual GnuPG > signatures). What kind (purpose) of signature is this? Does this mean that Windows won't reject the driver anymore during installation? Keep up with the excellent wo