Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> Here is the tun.c patch for correction of the netsh.exe commands.
So. Took me a while to incorporate it, and I took the opportunity to
do more windows ipv6 related cleanups:
- add routes with "store=active" as well (so if the mach
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:44:18PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> > Without "store=active", address assignment is "sticky" and will even
> > survive reboots - thus making the next tunnel setup fail, because the
> > address is already there. On WinXP, that was not needed, but Win7 seems
> >
On 5/10/2011 06:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> Seth Mos wrote:
>>> Here is the tun.c patch for correction of the netsh.exe commands.
>>>
>>> I've confirmed that the patch works on Windows XP SP2 and Windows 7.
>>>
>>> Patch!
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/11 15:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> I have not yet tested this, but Seth has, both on XP and Win7, so "ACK!"...
Windows XP SP2 is tested ... what about older XPs? Personally, I am in
favour of only supporting Windows versions which Microsoft off
Hi,
Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
>> Seth Mos wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the tun.c patch for correction of the netsh.exe commands.
>>>
>>> I've confirmed that the patch works on Windows XP SP2 and Windows 7.
>>>
>>> Patch!
>>>
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> Seth Mos wrote:
> > Here is the tun.c patch for correction of the netsh.exe commands.
> >
> > I've confirmed that the patch works on Windows XP SP2 and Windows 7.
> >
> > Patch!
> > http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/0001-Change-th
Hi Seth,
Seth Mos wrote:
> Here is the tun.c patch for correction of the netsh.exe commands.
>
>
>
> I've confirmed that the patch works on Windows XP SP2 and Windows 7.
>
> Patch!
> http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/0001-Change-the-netsh.exe-command-from-add-to-set-.-Th.patch
>
>
please explain t
