Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Hello folks,
stumbling about a bug in crypto.c I find a mismatch between
the last 2.1 version of crypto.c
(according to cvsweb: 1.23.2.3.2.2, Aug 26 2005)
and the tar openvpn-2.1_beta8.tar.gz.
Hello,
OpenVPN is on SVN now, at:
http://svn.openvpn.net/projects/openvpn/br
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> I am unable to find the CVS repository to the upcomming 2.0 version.
Thomas,
the CVS respository is the same as for version 1, but you'll need to
check out the BETA20 branch, i. e. run: "cvs update -rBETA20" (or pass
-rBETA20 to cvs checkout).
HTH,
Hi,
You're using the right server, just the wrong branch. Branches allow
you to take a copy of the work off the trunk (main branch) and work on
it for a while without disturbing everything else. Then once all the
work's been done and is mostly stable, you can merge the branch back
into the
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> What's the situation with the Sourgeforge CVS server?
> Seems the OpenVPN-2.0 beta 2 isn't in CVS (in tar-ball
> only).
>
> I used these commands to checkout
> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openvpn login
> cvs -z3 -d:pserv
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, James Yonan wrote:
> cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openvpn login
>
> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openvpn co -r EXP15
> openvpn
Ah, that beta stuff is on a side branch, with "-r EXP15" being the
magic. I was wondering why
Peter Sandström said:
> Hey,
>
> What's the current status of the CVS tree? I can't login using anonymous
> access.
>
> I was planning on implementing multiple-connections-to-one-openvpn-instance
> since I need it for a usecase.
> Not beeing able to checkout the source complicates this though :
Peter Sandström said:
> Hey,
>
> What's the current status of the CVS tree? I can't login using anonymous
> access.
>
> I was planning on implementing multiple-connections-to-one-openvpn-instance
> since I need it for a usecase.
> Not beeing able to checkout the source complicates this though :
