On 10/07/17 15:07, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:33:43PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> On 10/07/17 14:30, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:31:31PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Instead of cluttering the code with these ifdefs directly in t
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:33:43PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 10/07/17 14:30, Gert Doering wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:31:31PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> >> Instead of cluttering the code with these ifdefs directly in the main
> >> codebase, how about doing it in com
Hi,
On 10/07/17 14:30, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:31:31PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> Instead of cluttering the code with these ifdefs directly in the main
>> codebase, how about doing it in compat.h, like this (it's a copy/paste -
>> code might be wrapper by
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:31:31PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Instead of cluttering the code with these ifdefs directly in the main
> codebase, how about doing it in compat.h, like this (it's a copy/paste -
> code might be wrapper by the mail client):
Better, but I wonder if we shouldn
Hi,
On 22/02/17 03:27, David Sommerseth wrote:
> +#if defined LZ4_VERSION_NUMBER && LZ4_VERSION_NUMBER >= 10700
> +zlen = LZ4_compress_default((const char *)BPTR(buf), (char
> *)BPTR(work), BLEN(buf), zlen_max );
> +#else
> zlen = LZ4_compress_limitedOutput((const char *)BPTR(buf
