On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 11:58:21 PM CET David Sommerseth wrote:
> > argv_init (struct argv *a)
> > {
> >
> >a->capacity = 0;
> >a->argc = 0;
> >a->argv = NULL;
> >
> > + argv_extend (a, 8);
>
> Why 8? Done any performance and/or memory utilization tests? Does the
> overa
On 28/10/16 18:42, Heiko Hund wrote:
> Prevent the re-allocations of memory when the internal argv grows
> beyond 2 and 4 arguments by initially allocating argv to hold up to
> 7 (+ trailing NULL) pointers.
>
> While at it rename argv_reset to argv_free to actually express
> what's going on. Redo
