Agreed. I leapt a bit too far to land at my conclusion. :| I gladly defer to
those who have to live with this decision in the long run.
(Unfortunately, it seems that MS' VSTS doesn't have any WDK or EWDK CI
solutions at all...oh well.)
-Original Message-
From: Simon Rozman
Sent: Tuesd
Hi,
> I chose the EWDK thinking it would actually be easier for CI because it was
> so
> similar to the Win7 DDK, but from what you are saying I was wrong (at least
> for AppVeyor). Are you interested converting buildtap.py to use
> VS2017+WDK instead of the EWDK? I'm happy to do it, but I won't g
I chose the EWDK thinking it would actually be easier for CI because it was so
similar to the Win7 DDK, but from what you are saying I was wrong (at least for
AppVeyor). Are you interested converting buildtap.py to use VS2017+WDK instead
of the EWDK? I'm happy to do it, but I won't get to it unt
Hi,
I was dismissed by the AppVeyor about an image preinstalled with EWDK request.
They explained I can use their build cache to maintain a local EWDK copy.
Unfortunately, the build cache is account-specific, meaning every user trying
to run its own fork (including OpenVPN for upstream) will req
I have created a commit at
https://github.com/rozmansi/tap-windows6/commit/edefe4fbcaa51b756cc069d53c81c8d36de71d08
to throw on command errors. But I'm struggling with Git and GitHub to make a
PR for this commit alone.
Best regards,
Simon
From: Илья Шипицин
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018
Hi,
I like the idea of asking AppVeyor if they could include the EWDK in one of
their images. It is a standalone tool, so Visual Studio is not needed.
Sadly I don't see a Chocolatey package for the EWDK. That would have been
convenient.
The AppVeyor docs[1] say that the Visual Studio 2017 imag
hi,
I have some very amazing expirience with app veyor when I was playing with
mingw builds.
there was an issue related to mingw and I saw it between builds (mingw
upgraded), so I first decided "could it be app veyor ?!"
people from app veyor were very helpful in troubleshooting that.
so, I gue
Perhaps we could make the ISO available as a network share?
Il 14/06/2018 23:43, Jon Kunkee ha scritto:
> As I read the license (IANAL), consumers of the EWDK can copy, 'install', and
> run
> it pretty much anywhere in support of building software for Windows, just not
> as a public download.
>
As I read the license (IANAL), consumers of the EWDK can copy, 'install', and
run
it pretty much anywhere in support of building software for Windows, just not
as a public download.
A 5GB download is prohibitive, but do note that 'unpacking' is as simple as
mounting the ISO file.
-Origina
Hi!
Given all the recent updates to tap-windows6 building process, the AppVeyor
integration needs an update too.
Now the Microsoft EWDK is used to build the driver, I wasn't able to find
any such build environment on AppVeyor.
If the EWDK licence allows us, we could put EWDK online and have the
10 matches
Mail list logo
