Re: [Openvpn-devel] port-share and portability

2006-05-20 Thread Stephen Borrill
James Yonan wrote: Stephen Borrill wrote: Hi, I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since, well, ever, rea

Re: [Openvpn-devel] port-share and portability

2006-05-20 Thread James Yonan
Stephen Borrill wrote: Hi, I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since, well, ever, really. NetBSD and FreeB

[Openvpn-devel] port-share and portability

2006-05-18 Thread Stephen Borrill
Resent as didn't arrive first time. Hi, I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since, well, ever, really. Net

[Openvpn-devel] port-share and portability

2006-05-16 Thread Stephen Borrill
Hi, I've been looking at the 2.1 betas and getting excited about the port-share option. There's numerous caveats about lack of portability in the source and man page, but I don't know why. sendmsg and recvfrom have been in BSD since, well, ever, really. NetBSD and FreeBSD have both had MSG_NOS