Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach

2011-12-05 Thread David Sommerseth
urceforge.net >>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review >>> approach >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We've had a very strict patch review regime since we moved over >>>> to >>> git. &

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach

2011-12-05 Thread Samuli Seppänen
>> -Original Message- >> From: Samuli Seppänen [mailto:sam...@openvpn.net] >> Sent: maandag 5 december 2011 11:47 >> To: David Sommerseth >> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approa

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach

2011-12-05 Thread Adriaan de Jong
> -Original Message- > From: Samuli Seppänen [mailto:sam...@openvpn.net] > Sent: maandag 5 december 2011 11:47 > To: David Sommerseth > Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach > > > > &g

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach

2011-12-05 Thread Samuli Seppänen
> > Hi, > > We've had a very strict patch review regime since we moved over to git. > We see that this regime does work, but it can take a very long time > before patches are reviewed and ACKed for inclusion. This long delay is > something we are less happy about. > > So I'm suggesting a new appr

[Openvpn-devel] Suggesting a new patch review approach

2011-12-02 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We've had a very strict patch review regime since we moved over to git. We see that this regime does work, but it can take a very long time before patches are reviewed and ACKed for inclusion. This long delay is something we are less happy about