> The big question in my mind is whether this possibly small increase in
> performance will justify the loss of portability, and some level
> of stability and security.
>
> James
>
Agreed.
Is performance such a big issue anyway ? At least for clients, Open VPN's
current user-level design is no
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Gervasio Bernal wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes gullik.net> writes:
>
> >
> > Gervasio Bernal speedy.com.ar> writes:
> >
> > | First of all, I will explain what we are trying to develop. Basically,
> > our
> idea
> > | is to make OpenVPN works at kernel level, not at user
Lars Gullik Bjønnes gullik.net> writes:
>
> Gervasio Bernal speedy.com.ar> writes:
>
> | First of all, I will explain what we are trying to develop. Basically, our
idea
> | is to make OpenVPN works at kernel level, not at user level, and use the
linux
> | cryptoapi instead of openssl.
>
>
Gervasio Bernal writes:
| First of all, I will explain what we are trying to develop. Basically, our
idea
| is to make OpenVPN works at kernel level, not at user level, and use the
linux
| cryptoapi instead of openssl.
Just a question.
Why do you want to do this? Performance or something el
