On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Daniel Lehmann wrote:
> Am Montag 25 Oktober 2004 01:29 schrieb James Yonan:
> >
> > Yes, this is already merged in beta14.
> >
> > James
> >
>
> Hi,
> is it possible, that cryptoapi.c and cryptoapi.h are missing in the 2.0
> beta14
> source packages?
>
> Though, in the cv
Am Montag 25 Oktober 2004 01:29 schrieb James Yonan:
>
> Yes, this is already merged in beta14.
>
> James
>
Hi,
is it possible, that cryptoapi.c and cryptoapi.h are missing in the 2.0 beta14
source packages?
Though, in the cvs branch of beta14 these files are present.
Maybe anyone could fix this
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Torge Szczepanek wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2004, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Peter 'Luna' Runestig:
>
> > Hi! Here is a reworked version of my CryptoAPI patch, that also builds
> > with MinGW. I changed the name of the new source file to 'cryptoapi.c',
> > since there seems to
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Torge Szczepanek wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2004, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Peter 'Luna' Runestig:
Hi! Here is a reworked version of my CryptoAPI patch, that also builds
with MinGW. I changed the name of the new source file to 'cryptoapi.c',
since there seems to be some inter
Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2004, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Peter 'Luna' Runestig:
> Hi! Here is a reworked version of my CryptoAPI patch, that also builds
> with MinGW. I changed the name of the new source file to 'cryptoapi.c',
> since there seems to be some interest in other CryptoAPI usage in the
> code
On 2004-10-13 19:09, James Yonan wrote:
> Also... Would it be a lot of work to get your contribution to build with
> MinGW/gcc?
Hi! Here is a reworked version of my CryptoAPI patch, that also builds
with MinGW. I changed the name of the new source file to 'cryptoapi.c',
since there seems to be so
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Vlada Macek wrote:
> Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:
>
> > I don't know. I spent a couple of hours, trying to work around
> > MinGW's limitations when it comes to CryptoAPI, but I just ended up
> > in dead ends.
>
> Just a thought: Maybe this addon can be made as a dynamic p
Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:
I don't know. I spent a couple of hours, trying to work around
MinGW's limitations when it comes to CryptoAPI, but I just ended up
in dead ends.
Just a thought: Maybe this addon can be made as a dynamic plug-in. That
way both could be compiled in two different
On 2004-10-13 19:09, James Yonan wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Didier Conchaudron wrote:
>
>> You Swedish guys are really making amazing softwares!
>>
>> I'm very pleased you add this patch because I plan to make it in few
>> months! So I can *really* concentrate on my tcp server patch, which is
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Didier Conchaudron wrote:
> You Swedish guys are really making amazing softwares!
>
> I'm very pleased you add this patch because I plan to make it in few
> months! So I can *really* concentrate on my tcp server patch, which is
> really not ready.
>
> I will test your patc
You Swedish guys are really making amazing softwares!
I'm very pleased you add this patch because I plan to make it in few
months! So I can *really* concentrate on my tcp server patch, which is
really not ready.
I will test your patch with another smart card I plan to use later.
Thanks a lot
... and here is the CryptoAPI patch:
-8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<-
diff -uN openvpn-2.0_beta11.msvc/SSL_CTX_use_CryptoAPI_certificate.c
openvpn-2.0_beta11/SSL_CTX_use_CryptoAPI_certificate.c
--- openvpn-2.0_beta11.msvc/SSL_CTX_use_CryptoAPI_ce
12 matches
Mail list logo
