Hi,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:50:47AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> Wow, I mean WOW!! This is quite some work you've done!
[..]
What he said :-)
I'm not so pessimistic regarding inclusion in 2.3, though - yes, 2.3 brings
large changes, but not yet in the SSL arena. So why not break that as
On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 02.12.2010 10:46, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>> On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation.
>>> This entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high l
mber 2010 11:51
> To: Adriaan de Jong
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend
> patches
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/12/10 10:05, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> >
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:10:29 +0100 Matthias Andree
wrote:
> > most distro switch from openssl to nss. is there any reason you switch
> > to polarssl in stead of nss?
> >
>
> What do you base the "most distro" assessment on?
>
> Are you aware of any website discussing the advantages of the "big
Am 02.12.2010 10:46, schrieb Farkas Levente:
> On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. This
>> entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high level, removing the
>> dependencies on OpenSSL, and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/10 10:05, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. This
> entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high level, removing the
> dependencies on OpenSSL, and adding supp
...@debuntu.org]
Sent: donderdag 2 december 2010 11:20
To: Adriaan de Jong
Cc: Farkas Levente; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend patches
PolarSSL was a personal choice for us, mostly due to its simplicity and
multi-platform
donderdag 2 december 2010 10:47
> > To: Adriaan de Jong
> > Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend
> > patches
> >
> > On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> > &
Farkas Levente [mailto:lfar...@lfarkas.org]
> Sent: donderdag 2 december 2010 10:47
> To: Adriaan de Jong
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend
> patches
>
> On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. This
> entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high level, removing the
> dependencies on OpenSSL, and adding support for a simpler, easier to evaluate
> l
Hi List,
We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. This
entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high level, removing the
dependencies on OpenSSL, and adding support for a simpler, easier to evaluate
library (PolarSSL).
This was done in a series of patches:
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
