Hi,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:01:55PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:43:12PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >> What I am asking is for people that wishes to work with me on this
> >> (not the ACK/NACK approach) to all
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:43:12PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> What I am asking is for people that wishes to work with me on this
>> (not the ACK/NACK approach) to allow perfecting this *BEFORE* merge.
>
> I would actually ask for "no
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:43:12PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> What I am asking is for people that wishes to work with me on this
> (not the ACK/NACK approach) to allow perfecting this *BEFORE* merge.
I would actually ask for "no more cleanup changes to tun.c before 2.3" -
I have cleaned up
Hello,
I started to work on the syshead cleanups, then found my-self
evaluating the tun.c complexity, and prioritize it.
So basically we have two branches:
https://github.com/alonbl/openvpn/compare/master...syshead
https://github.com/alonbl/openvpn/compare/master...tun
The tun branch is based on
