Hi,
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> > 2) What you mean by "hack"? Do you mean new packet format or something else?
> The byte juggling the compress does.
Actually the "compress byte swap hack" is for the de-crypted material,
while *this* discussion is concernced ab
Am 03.01.14 12:58, schrieb Lev Stipakov:
> Hi Arne,
>
> I am researching how "session id" can be added to packet. Could you please
> clarify the statement "If we choose the session id to be 3 or 7 byte we
> would not need the "hack" for the packets with
> session id." ?
>
> I am currently at very
Hi!
On 30.12.2013 18:31, Arne Schwabe wrote:
For negoating the packet format the client would submit something like
IV_CLNT_SUPPORT 1 or similar (look at the IV_SNAPPY, IV_LZO for
compression) to tell the server the supported format and the server
would push a packet-format 1 or something simila
Hi Arne,
I am researching how "session id" can be added to packet. Could you please
clarify the statement "If we choose the session id to be 3 or 7 byte we
would not need the "hack" for the packets with
session id." ?
I am currently at very beginning, so questions might look odd.
1) "3 or 7" -
Am 30.12.13 16:10, schrieb Heikki Hannikainen:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:43 PM, André Valentin wrote:
>> On 23.12.2013 12:32, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> We've discussed the patch on the Munich Hackathon, and we intend to do
>>> it in a different way. James wants to change the packet format for
>>>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:43 PM, André Valentin wrote:
> On 23.12.2013 12:32, Gert Doering wrote:
>> We've discussed the patch on the Munich Hackathon, and we intend to do
>> it in a different way. James wants to change the packet format for
>> data packets anyway (due to bad alignment in the cur
Hi!
On 23.12.2013 12:32, Gert Doering wrote:
> We've discussed the patch on the Munich Hackathon, and we intend to do
> it in a different way. James wants to change the packet format for
> data packets anyway (due to bad alignment in the current packet format),
> and the new format would have the
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:15:48PM +0100, Andre Valentin wrote:
> Just for reference, I got my throughput numbers from:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/7384/focus=7395
Just so that it has been said :-)
We've discussed the patch on the Munich Hackathon, and we intend to
Hi!
Just for reference, I got my throughput numbers from:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/7384/focus=7395
André
--
With kind regards,
André Valentin
Projektkoordination / Systemadministration
MarcanT GmbH, Ravensberger Str. 10 G, D - 33602 Bielefeld
Fon: +49 (521) 95945-0 |
Hi!
This updates my floating patch to current trunk. I tested it for over 2 weeks
now.
Please review!
André
--- Begin Message ---
>From bab19ca1b1f1b89dca00ca18e258dbe1dacf4891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: avalentin
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:
10 matches
Mail list logo
