Hi
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:10:55AM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Selva Nair
> >
> > NAK for 2.3 - what we have there works well enough.
>
> The reason for adding it to 2.3 was anticipating it will have to be built
Hi,
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Selva Nair
>
> NAK for 2.3 - what we have there works well enough.
>
The reason for adding it to 2.3 was anticipating it will have to be built
for vista+ if the dns-leak patch goes in.
In fact I wrote it the i
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Selva Nair
NAK for 2.3 - what we have there works well enough.
Prettyfying things will only be done in master (unless the 2.3 stuff
does not *work*, in which case "cleanup when fixing bugs" is fine - but
it does
Signed-off-by: Selva Nair
---
check_symbols_in.m4 | 43 +++
configure.ac| 17 +
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 check_symbols_in.m4
diff --git a/check_symbols_in.m4 b/check_symbols_in.m4
new