Hi,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:01:20AM +0100, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> The non-TLS mode is a relict from OpenVPN 1.x or 2.0. When tls mode was
> introduce the advantages of TLS over non-tls were small but tls mode
> evolved to include a lot more features. (NCP, multipeer, AEAD ciphers to name
> a few
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 01:01, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> The non-TLS mode is a relict from OpenVPN 1.x or 2.0. When tls mode was
> introduce the advantages of TLS over non-tls were small but tls mode
> evolved to include a lot more features. (NCP, multipeer, AEAD ciphers to name
> a few).
>
> Today VPN tha
Am 25.03.21 um 20:57 schrieb Antonio Quartulli:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/03/2021 20:29, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> I find the reasons you present to withdraw the symmetric non-TLS mode
>> too weak to justify its deprecation or removal. Yes, TLS-based
>> configurations may be more feature-rich, but those are
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 20:29, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I find the reasons you present to withdraw the symmetric non-TLS mode
> too weak to justify its deprecation or removal. Yes, TLS-based
> configurations may be more feature-rich, but those are not mandatory and
> we should not paternalize the users
Am 25.03.21 um 01:01 schrieb Arne Schwabe:
> The non-TLS mode is a relict from OpenVPN 1.x or 2.0. When tls mode was
> introduce the advantages of TLS over non-tls were small but tls mode
> evolved to include a lot more features. (NCP, multipeer, AEAD ciphers to name
> a few).
>
> Today VPN that us
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 16:46, tincanteksup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/03/2021 07:59, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25/03/2021 08:49, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> That change (that was *Actually* made in 2.4) was exactly to remove this
>>> ambiguity.
>>
>> Forgive my hasty reply. This combinatio
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 07:59, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 08:49, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
That change (that was *Actually* made in 2.4) was exactly to remove this
ambiguity.
Forgive my hasty reply. This combination of option is actually
not-supported since 2.5 (in 2.4 we probably o
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 08:49, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> That change (that was *Actually* made in 2.4) was exactly to remove this
> ambiguity.
Forgive my hasty reply. This combination of option is actually
not-supported since 2.5 (in 2.4 we probably only introduced the
deprecation warning).
Regards,
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 01:47, tincanteksup wrote:
> I made this change to the wiki:
> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/DeprecatedOptions?action=diff&version=45
I had this discussion with "Pippin_" in #openvpn-meeting:
The change you made is wrong. That part of the wikipage talks about
movin
I made this change to the wiki:
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/DeprecatedOptions?action=diff&version=45
___
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
The non-TLS mode is a relict from OpenVPN 1.x or 2.0. When tls mode was
introduce the advantages of TLS over non-tls were small but tls mode
evolved to include a lot more features. (NCP, multipeer, AEAD ciphers to name
a few).
Today VPN that use --secret are mainly used because of its relative eas
The non-TLS mode is a relict from OpenVPN 1.x or 2.0. When tls mode was
introduce the advantages of TLS over non-tls were small but tls mode
evolved to include a lot more features. (NCP, multipeer, AEAD ciphers to name
a few).
Today VPN that use --secret are mainly used because of its relative eas
12 matches
Mail list logo
