Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:03:00PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> -std=c89
>Makes the LZ4 library we're shipping explode.
We could fix that, but right now the LZ4 sources are "very close to
upstream" (just a few file and #include renames) so that would make
comparison "are these sane s
On 30 August 2016 at 00:41, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production" phase March
> 2017, OpenVPN have generally s
Hi all,
hopefully this message is not completely garbled by Apple Mail ...
>
>
> […]
>
> Just some more benchmarks. I just compiled successfully with -std=c99
> on an old Scientific Linux 6.5 (RHEL 6.5 clone) I found. Another
> important detail, RHEL5 will reach the "End of Production" phas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> HI,
>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
> HI,
>
> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
> wrote:
>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
Previously, we would use the compiler's default
HI,
On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
>>> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
>>> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
>>> clang, but mi
On 29 August 2016 at 21:29, Selva Nair wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
>>
>> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
>> > defaults
>> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
>> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
>> clang, but might even differ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
> clang, but might even differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might
> even
> > differ per distro.
> >
> >
On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even
> differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of GCC < 4.9, was that
Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but might even
differ per distro.
One of the reasons to accept the gnu89 default of GCC < 4.9, was that MSVC
didn't support c99. But in MSVC 2015, MS finanally fix
12 matches
Mail list logo
