-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/12 20:16, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Looks good. If you testing this one, please ensure symbolic links
> also works properly... :)
Just to confirm, as I forgot to mention that in the 'applied' message
earlier on. This was tested with symlinks on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/12 19:54, David Sommerseth wrote:
> To avoid confusion between check_file_access() and
> check_cmd_access() in the future, remove unneeded arguments from
> check_cmd_access()
>
> As a command will always be a file, it should always check for
Hi,
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:16:36PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Looks good.
> If you testing this one, please ensure symbolic links also works properly...
> :)
The man page for access() (on Linux) states:
DESCRIPTION
access() checks whether the calling process can access the file p
Looks good.
If you testing this one, please ensure symbolic links also works properly... :)
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:54 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> To avoid confusion between check_file_access() and check_cmd_access() in the
> future, remove unneeded arguments from check_cmd_access()
>
> As a c
To avoid confusion between check_file_access() and check_cmd_access() in the
future, remove unneeded arguments from check_cmd_access()
As a command will always be a file, it should always check for CHKACC_FILE and
nothing else. And as the commands always will need X_OK, check only for that.
One
