Hi,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 03:50:45PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 13.04.14 15:01, schrieb Gert Doering:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> >> I'll amend that when committing.
> > Here is the patch with the MSVC build change, plus some changes to the
> > commit
Am 13.04.14 15:01, schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> I'll amend that when committing.
> Here is the patch with the MSVC build change, plus some changes to the
> commit message to point to the pull request and trac.
>
>
ACK from me for t
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> I'll amend that when committing.
Here is the patch with the MSVC build change, plus some changes to the
commit message to point to the pull request and trac.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Hi,
this came in as github pull req #14, and fixes the socks problem that
people are complaining about in about every list, except here and in
trac... - there *is* also trac#377.
The patch "as is" breaks windows compilation as...
> + if (p->authfile[0])
> + method_sel[2] = 0x02; /* METHOD
From: Yawning Angel
So, RFC 1928 doesn't say anything about the METHODS field in the Method
Selection message being ordered in terms of preference or anything, and
the server is free to pick any of the METHODS offered by the client.
Always sending a Method Selection message with NO AUTHENTICATIO
