Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set without port argument

2020-09-09 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
M > >> To: Vladislav Grishenko ; openvpn- > >> de...@lists.sourceforge.net > >> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be > >> set without port argument > >> > >> On 03/09/2020 13:44, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set without port argument

2020-09-09 Thread David Sommerseth
On 08/09/2020 21:01, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > Hi David, > >> -Original Message- >> From: David Sommerseth >> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 6:23 PM >> To: Vladislav Grishenko ; openvpn- >> de...@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Op

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set without port argument

2020-09-08 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
Hi David, > -Original Message- > From: David Sommerseth > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 6:23 PM > To: Vladislav Grishenko ; openvpn- > de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set > without > port a

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set without port argument

2020-09-08 Thread David Sommerseth
On 03/09/2020 13:44, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > According client-options.rst additional argumets ``port`` and ``proto`` > are both optional and it's allowed to have port absent and protocol set: > --remote args > Examples: > remote server.example.net tcp > > But when protocol

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix --remote protocol can't be set without port argument

2020-09-03 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
According client-options.rst additional argumets ``port`` and ``proto`` are both optional and it's allowed to have port absent and protocol set: --remote args Examples: remote server.example.net tcp But when protocol is set without preceeding port argument, it is being misparsed