My read of it suggested that, yeah, it only does NT or above, due to the
better net stack in the NT family tree.
Felipe Sanchez wrote:
This has to be one of the greatest news I've had this week :-) Count me
in as a heavy beta-tester!
I have one question: If I recall correctly the cipe TA
Matthias Andree wrote:
If OpenSSL is in the base system of FreeBSD, then there shouldn't be any
problem linking LZO with it.
You could also allow OpenVPN binaries without LZO support (as I
currently do in Debian).
This will break compatibility and is no longer needed in the light of
the special
James, Folks,
I noticed a minor problem as my RH62 box started up:
$Starting openvpn: /etc/rc.d/init.d/openvpn: [: ==: binary operator expected
That's two distinct, common errors:
- $localization stuff that doesn't work on bash1
- an == in a [] in the script.
These are both directly relate
Aaron Sethman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, bishop wrote:
So, what do we do? We write an exeption in a GPL-licensed project's
software license? That only seems shady on the surface, like one's
trying to exempt oneself from someone else's licensing - -I'd like to do
th
Of course another option here is to consider getting OpenVPN to play nice
with gnutls, though I am not familiary with the maturity of that piece of
software.
Does anyone else here consider this to be entirely the wrong way to go?
First off, the problem appears to be one that's present in all ca
Douglas Keller wrote:
James Yonan writes:
> This beta can be considered an initial release candidate for 1.2.0. See
> changelog below.
>
Things are looking good for me...built the rpm with
"rpm -ta openvpn-1.1.1.18.tar.gz", the rpm included the init
script correctly. I installed it on my
