Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-11 Thread TomWalsh
Matthias Andree wrote: RPM appears to, at least on Red Hat and Novell/SUSE derived machines, support the libraries' ELF SONAME, too, which is what my former suggestion has been about, and AFAICS, the soname is the same on all machines, namely liblzo.so.1 (use readelf -d to figure). Wouldn't

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-10 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that. T

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-10 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that. The correct statement which works around the Mandrake 10.1 proble

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-10 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote: As long as we are on the subject of "Requires" in the openvpn.spec file, shouldn't there also be a: Requires: bridge-utils >= 0.9.7 Why is this required? What if you are not bridging? James Ok, my view on

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-10 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that. The correct statement which works around the Mandrake 10.1 proble

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-06 Thread TomWalsh
As long as we are on the subject of "Requires" in the openvpn.spec file, shouldn't there also be a: Requires: bridge-utils >= 0.9.7 ? I know that this is not part of a default installation under Mandrake. TomW -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant email at http://openhardware.n

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-03-01 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: I will let the package maintainer of liblzo1 of the problem of it not saying it provides "liblzo" while the liblzo1-devel does say that. The correct statement which works around the Mandrake 10.1 problem would be: fix

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-02-27 Thread TomWalsh
Matthias Andree wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, TomWalsh wrote: Hmm, although the build of the RPM will succeed, the package won't install. Doing a mere "urpmi openvpn" results in: == error [root@localhost root]# urpmi openvpn Some package r

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-02-27 Thread TomWalsh
TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: What if you use this instead for the Mandrake section: %{!?without_lzo:BuildRequires: liblzo-devel >= 1.07} %{!?without_lzo:Requires: liblzo >= 1.07} James Hmm, although the build of the RPM will succeed, the package won't inst

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-02-27 Thread TomWalsh
TomWalsh wrote: James Yonan wrote: What if you use this instead for the Mandrake section: %{!?without_lzo:BuildRequires: liblzo-devel >= 1.07} %{!?without_lzo:Requires: liblzo >= 1.07} James Still fails. Err, I got something mixed up here. It did work that time usi

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-02-27 Thread TomWalsh
James Yonan wrote: What if you use this instead for the Mandrake section: %{!?without_lzo:BuildRequires: liblzo-devel >= 1.07} %{!?without_lzo:Requires: liblzo >= 1.07} James Still fails. -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant email at http://openhardware.net?file=e

[Openvpn-devel] RPM build of 2.0-rc16 fails on MandrakeSoft

2005-02-26 Thread TomWalsh
Just a note to say that the openvpn.spec file seems to have a problem building an RPM on a Mandrake system. The build system info: Mandrake 10.1 Official PowerPack (stock distro, not upgraded). RPM version 4.2.2 The problem seems to be with rpmbuild incorrectly identifying / seeing liblzo-d