ord is secret, and there is a standard mechanism in openvpn
>>> to handle password...
>>> So I tried to use it.
>>>
>>> For the conditionals, I wanted to get rid of the openssl engine
>>> conditionals... anyway, the conditionals is not for the ENGINE ty
>
> Can you please re-test and comment?
>
> Thanks!
> Alon.
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Habets wrote:
>> I can confirm that it works. I need to specify both engine and
>> engine-pvk in the config though. If "engine" is not specified
ease review and test, should reach the same functionality as you require.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alon.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/alonbl/openvpn/compare/master...engine
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Thomas Habets wrote:
>>> Those questions a
ish() at proper place?
>
> Thank you for your patience,
> Alon Bar-Lev.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Thomas Habets wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Need? No. I thought you preferred reusing the loaded/inited ENGINE
>> struct cached by existing code instead
them.
Some more details:
http://blog.habets.pp.se/2012/02/TPM-backed-SSL
Signed-off-by: Thomas Habets
On 17 June 2012 01:11, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is a good idea.
> But first, please remove the emacs stuff.
>
> Now, I see that the ENGINE_load_builtin_e
s to the built-in UI methods because openssl-tpm-engine
doesn't yet support user data being sent to the callback functions.
A patch for that on its way to them.
Some more details:
http://blog.habets.pp.se/2012/02/TPM-backed-SSL
Signed-off-by: Thomas Habets
--
typedef struct me_s {
cha
