On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> I do not really see people sharing multiple OpenVPN services behind
> one single "reverse proxy"
That was my intent but obviously there will not be such a service if
the client cannot support it.
> with OpenVPN
> you usually specify the port
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Josh Cepek wrote:
>> akin to how HTTP reverse proxies commonly delegate to a physical server
>> according to the HTTP 1.1 Host header—so that many hostnames can map
>> to the same IP of the reverse proxy.
>
> There was some issue figuring out what this all means. D
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> I will be happy to look at the patch
Thanks.
(As mentioned in the initial summary, the newly introduced behavior
probably needs to be a configurable option, but I did not want to
spend time implementing that unless there was general agreemen
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Also as: https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/pull/6
Ping. Anyone care about this?
Also as: https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/pull/6
I was exploring the possibility of using a SOCKS5 server to multiplex
OpenVPN connections based on hostname (in the remote option), akin to
how HTTP reverse proxies commonly delegate to a physical server
according to the HTTP 1.1 Host header—so th
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a04afff..3a2f384
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -54,3 +54,4 @@ tests/t_client.sh
tests/t_client-*-20??-??/
src/openvpn/openvpn
config-version.h
+nbproject
--
1.8.1.2
