Karl O. Pinc wrote on 25/04/2009 7:42 PM:
On 04/25/2009 12:50:26 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/24/2009 07:40:02 AM, Siim Põder wrote:
[snip]
Please pardon me for thinking out loud here...
I'll follow in this path, thinking out loud ...
David Sommerseth wrote:
James MacLean wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have parsed around a bit but have not come up with a solid
suggestion to increase performance in the following environment :
. +150 clients always on, always via COAX modem 15Mb/s down 1.5Mb/s up.
. OpenVPN-2.0.9 and 2.1rc13 tested
Hi Folks,
I have parsed around a bit but have not come up with a solid suggestion
to increase performance in the following environment :
. +150 clients always on, always via COAX modem 15Mb/s down 1.5Mb/s up.
. OpenVPN-2.0.9 and 2.1rc13 tested, setup as single server
. Server Kernel 2.6.25.4
.
Hi Folks,
Sorry for posting here after also posting as a bug. Just wasn't on the
ball subscribing this morning :(.
On a 64 bit Dell ( 2.6.25.4 #1 SMP Sat May 24 23:03:01 ADT 2008 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux) we are servicing over 150 connections. Seems we
have hit a magic number as the pe
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, James Yonan wrote:
> A new release of the 2.0 beta is available.
Hi James,
We have started to look at how we can make use of the single daemon mode
of OpenVPN, but after playing with options and doing some searching we
thought it best to post and get direct answers to 2 thin
