Hi, I have a little information about Linux
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:30 AM, David Sommerseth <
open...@sf.lists.topphemmelig.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The brand new OpenVPN 3 Linux client on Linux is moving forward and getting
> into a reasonable good shape. Early adopters on RHEL/CentOS/Scienti
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
wrote:
> I was testing Tunnelblick with Selva's C/R server and config (thanks
> again for that) and there was a problem. Maybe I'm (still)
> misunderstanding something, but a SIGUSR1 restart asks for the normal
> username/password instead
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
> wrote:
>
>> Some, perhaps including Selva's $payingCustomer, may not want to use
>> Tunnelblick betas or use OpenVPN 2.5 until it is released.
>
> I missed this last time... Its Gert
I was testing Tunnelblick with Selva's C/R server and config (thanks
again for that) and there was a problem. Maybe I'm (still)
misunderstanding something, but a SIGUSR1 restart asks for the normal
username/password instead of a static C/R.
That is, the first thing after the restart is ">PASSWORD:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
wrote:
> Some, perhaps including Selva's $payingCustomer, may not want to use
> Tunnelblick betas or use OpenVPN 2.5 until it is released.
I missed this last time... Its Gert who has $$payingCustomer(s) :)
Selva
Thanks, Selva,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
> >> Jon: I have a server for testing static and dynamic challenge. If
> >> interested
Hi,
The brand new OpenVPN 3 Linux client on Linux is moving forward and getting
into a reasonable good shape. Early adopters on RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux
can already test this via an openvpn3 Fedora Copr repository [1].
But that's not enough. We want to have this in Debian and Ubuntu as wel
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>
> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
So, the patch looks good, and it works nicely on my buildslave.
There's
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
>> Jon: I have a server for testing static and dynamic challenge. If
>> interested I can send you a config. Or use access server with a free
>> test license. Mine will ju
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:51:53PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> Hoping that clarifies your concern. :)
It leaves me a bit puzzled, to be honest... our buildbots *should*
have caught it (NetBSD 5.1/amd64 and NetBSD 7.0.1/i386), as it runs a
"topology subnet" test and tries to ping the remote IP and
>> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
>> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>>
>> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
>
> This comes as a bit of surprise - has something changed here on the
> NetBSD side? Which NetBSD version did you test this
Am 23.07.18 um 05:45 schrieb James Bekkema:
> According to the source code, the environment variable for the GUI version
> should be IV_GUI_VER, rather than IV_UI_VER. This patch simply fixes this
> small typo in the docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bekkema
ACK.
12 matches
Mail list logo
