On 27/02/2017 18:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 27/02/17 23:06, James Yonan wrote:
>> On 25/02/2017 08:40, Steffan Karger wrote:
> [...snip...]
>>> I'd say so. Something like:
>>>
>>> legacy: RSA 1024+, SHA1+, all curves
>>> default: RSA 2048+, SHA2+, all curves
>>> suiteb: no RSA, SHA256/SHA38
On 27/02/17 23:06, James Yonan wrote:
> On 25/02/2017 08:40, Steffan Karger wrote:
[...snip...]
>> I'd say so. Something like:
>>
>> legacy: RSA 1024+, SHA1+, all curves
>> default: RSA 2048+, SHA2+, all curves
>> suiteb: no RSA, SHA256/SHA384, P-256/P-384
>>
>> As long as we kick anything that's
On 25/02/2017 08:40, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 25-02-17 07:04, James Yonan wrote:
>> On 24/02/2017 16:10, Steffan Karger wrote:
>>> On 24-02-17 22:28, James Yonan wrote:
On 24/02/2017 02:40, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 23-02-17 22:41, James Yonan wrote:
>> On 23/02/2017 01:22, Steffan