Am 28.04.16 um 04:01 schrieb Rafael Gava:
> Hi Arne,
>
> what a surprise I thought that the NAT patch had been dropped. :-)
More or less forgotten. IIrc the active FTP part was controversal. This
part is okay.
> So, please, should I change the code based on your comments and resend
> the patch?
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 74586c6508e5dd283eaef9d098644a7800beec01
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sun Apr 17 20:35:43 2016 +0200
Rename files with 'polarssl' in the name to 'mbedtls'
Signed-off-by: Steffan Ka
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
(One minor whitespace fix to configure.ac)
Just to point it out here again, in case someone is frustrated and googles
for it: mbedTLS 2.x refuses RSA keys < 2048 bits by default - so if your
setup is nicely working with shorter RSA keys and PolarS
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit fab49d17d36053189cf504d57e53a8b0cb907f6f
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sat Mar 5 17:08:22 2016 +0100
Implemented x509-track for PolarSSL.
Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger
Acked-b
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
(Changes.rst had to be manually applied as it conflicted with an
intermediate change)
commit dd2fbc26eb7b32325793ae3f7d215f46e881e68c (master)
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon Apr 4 21:59:38 2016
Am 09.03.16 um 00:10 schrieb Steffan Karger:
> Hi,
>
> This addition is welcome and the code does the job it promises to do,
> but after reviewing the code I would like to propose a different
> implementation. The reasons for this are gives as inline replies
> below. The alternative patch propos
Am 04.04.16 um 23:01 schrieb Steffan Karger:
> Hi list,
>
> I just noticed I sent my previous reply only to James, instead of to
> the list. See below.
>
ACK. Also code identical to James and only docu added.
Arne
