On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:14:18AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> > An added bonus is that openvpnserv2 is written in C#, which means it can
> > be developed on Linux using Mono, and the language choice probably helps
> > getting new
(forgot to CC the mailing list earlier)
>
> In case we stay with openvpnserv2, I think some followup questions
> need to be asked...
>
> - do we want to migrate "interactive service" functionality into
>openvpnserv2 as well? More code, but not overly complex stuff
>(if the network/route
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:14:18AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
An added bonus is that openvpnserv2 is written in C#, which means it can
be developed on Linux using Mono, and the language choice probably helps
getting new contributions from people not fluent with C.
I'm not totally convin
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:14:18AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> An added bonus is that openvpnserv2 is written in C#, which means it can
> be developed on Linux using Mono, and the language choice probably helps
> getting new contributions from people not fluent with C.
I'm not totally c
Il 27/01/2016 00:54, Selva Nair ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Gert Doering mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de>> wrote:
Since Heiko has reworked the "classic" code (in automatic.c now, as
he called this "automatic service") maybe we can just use the
opportunity
to get the
