Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Fish wrote:
> Based on release/2.3 branch and ValdikSS's v9 patch, this patch is
> cross-compiled on Linux and tested on Windows XP/10. The VC project file is
> left untouched - you might want to add rpcrt4.lib to compile and link it
> under
> MSVC.
>
Builds
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> ACK. Lots of people have reviewed this, and it made the patch better :-)
> - so I list them all, and take the final blame (ACK) on me...
>
Thanks (for assuming the blame :). And, ValdikSS, thanks for putting up
with all the opinionated com
ACK. I verified that this patch is identical to the 2.3 patch except
for the option check in options.c, and the #ifdef for VISTA+ - so same
ACK here, and same list of reviewers. Thanks.
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 38c8565810f892a41a2ea0d18a707676119f1af0 (master)
A
ACK. Lots of people have reviewed this, and it made the patch better :-)
- so I list them all, and take the final blame (ACK) on me...
Your patch has been applied to the release/2.3 branch.
commit dd628d2e0d786e478fd99d54000dceaa42d53855 (release/2.3)
Author: ValdikSS
List-Post: openvpn-devel@li
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:29:33PM +0200, Lev Stipakov wrote:
> Thanks, I think (I think!) I got it now.
>
> 1) Since we have tt->adapter_index (which temporarily disappeared from
> my perception of reality), no need to add new member to tuntap or
> tuntap_options.
>
> 2) tt->adapter_index
ACK, thanks. I have not actually built or tested a 2.3 binary, but since
the code is nearly the same as for master and that one works nicely, I
assume this works as well.
Your patch has been applied to the release/2.3 branch.
commit ca8cead8fd8c00154f35b90593442e2bfa8f735d (release/2.3)
Author:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 08:00:26PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> ACK, and thanks. Code looks good and I'm reasonably sure that it will
> do the right thing - waiting for buildbot now to produce a windows binary
> to actually test it :-) - then applying the 2.3 version to 2.3
Works! "ifconfig
forgot to copy the list..
Hi,
Sorry, I missed the point that only referenced files are being replaced.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Jonathan K. Bullard
wrote:
> I'm not clear at all about --crl-verify. Would it ever be used in a
> client? Would there be a security risk if a client erased t
ACK, and thanks. Code looks good and I'm reasonably sure that it will
do the right thing - waiting for buildbot now to produce a windows binary
to actually test it :-) - then applying the 2.3 version to 2.3
Chances are good that this will break compilation with older MSVC versions,
though (as the
Am 12.12.15 um 23:37 schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> Might not really be related to this but have looked into the work that
>> provides the certificates and keys via the managment console? We have
>> even have a contrib program that g
Thanks, Selva.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
> I suppose, not just adding but also removing options will be allowed. There
> could be more options that are ok (i.e not unsafe) to remove but not change.
What I'm proposing isn't to allow "add/remove/modify" options in the
Open
11 matches
Mail list logo
