[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Fix build on OpenSolaris (non-gmake)

Patch has been applied to the master branch. commit 710c439817522ac8f4dfa7411baa787c5e2e2f89 Author: Gert Doering List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon Jul 27 22:46:50 2015 +0200 Fix build on OpenSolaris (non-gmake) Signed-off-by: Gert Doering Acked-by: Steff

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix build on OpenSolaris (non-gmake)

On 27-07-15 22:46, Gert Doering wrote: Was broken in commit 9de35d4, missing backslash in include/Makefile.am Signed-off-by: Gert Doering --- include/Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/Makefile.am b/include/Makefile.am index 70f20e9..c5a

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix build on OpenSolaris (non-gmake)

Was broken in commit 9de35d4, missing backslash in include/Makefile.am Signed-off-by: Gert Doering --- include/Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/Makefile.am b/include/Makefile.am index 70f20e9..c5a91b1 100644 --- a/include/Makefile.am +++ b/i

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Topics for today's (27th July 2015) community meeting

Hi, Here's the summary of today's IRC meeting. --- COMMUNITY MEETING Place: #openvpn-devel on irc.freenode.net List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Monday 27th Jul 2015 Time: 20:00 CEST (18:00 UTC) Planned meeting topics for this meeting were here:

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Fix out-of-tree builds; openvpn-plugin.h should be in AC_CONFIG_HEADERS

Your patch has been applied to the master branch. commit 0a51c4f152d0f695a6fb8b605dbfefca65e63838 Author: Steffan Karger List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon Jul 27 21:59:58 2015 +0200 Fix out-of-tree builds; openvpn-plugin.h should be in AC_CONFIG_HEADERS Signed-

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix out-of-tree builds; openvpn-plugin.h should be in AC_CONFIG_HEADERS

Was broken in commit 9de35d4. Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger --- configure.ac | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 7bcbb7c..51ef93b 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ AC_DEFINE([OPENVPN_VERSION_MINOR],

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Provide compile time OpenVPN version information to plug-ins

Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:02:46PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Your patch has been applied to the master branch. Actually, not... this breaks out of tree builds... gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../openvpn/src/openvpn -I../.. -I../../../openvpn/include -I../../../openvpn/src/compat

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Provide OpenVPN runtime version information to plug-ins

ACK. Your patch has been applied to the master branch. commit 6a40276c7500c2d0a2fe44b1a450ffe9cb2f37cd Author: David Sommerseth List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri Jul 10 15:22:28 2015 +0200 Provide OpenVPN runtime version information to plug-ins Signed-off-by: D

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Provide compile time OpenVPN version information to plug-ins

Your patch has been applied to the master branch. commit 9de35d4633ce3035b048957b2e20b81e31a40cd6 Author: David Sommerseth List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri Jul 10 15:22:27 2015 +0200 Provide compile time OpenVPN version information to plug-ins Signed-off-by: D

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Provide compile time OpenVPN version information to plug-ins

On 10-07-15 15:22, David Sommerseth wrote: From: David Sommerseth This is to provide more fine grained information to plug-ins about the OpenVPN environment when OpenVPN was built. Signed-off-by: David Sommerseth --- .gitignore| 1 + configure.ac

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Fix commit e473b7c if an inline file happens to have a line break exactly at buffer limit

Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.3 branch. I've removed the extra blank line that sneaked in. commit d40cbf0e2601b35bfb1c0551c6f3907b5c5178ff (master) commit 57576475f5d6e5dd9cdb64fa0edcf283ce4a05c9 (release/2.3) Author: Arne Schwabe List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourcefo

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix commit e473b7c if an inline file happens to have a line break exactly at buffer limit

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Arne Schwabe wrote: > The check does only for strlen(line) space and buf_printf will only use at most space -1 > and not print the final character ('\n') in this corner. Since a missing \n only breaks > certificates at the start and end marker, missing line brea

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: reintroduce md5_digest wrapper struct to fix gcc warnings

Your patch has been applied to the master branch. Reference to 827de237860813d2859a added, as requested :-) commit 2dd6501e3d679046a1ed488f22d62defdf737cf3 (master) Author: Steffan Karger List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun Jul 26 13:27:19 2015 +0200 reintroduce md5_

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix commit e473b7c if an inline file happens to have a line break exactly at buffer limit

The check does only for strlen(line) space and buf_printf will only use at most space -1 and not print the final character ('\n') in this corner. Since a missing \n only breaks certificates at the start and end marker, missing line breaks otherwise do not trigger this error. --- src/openvpn/buf

[Openvpn-devel] Topics for today's (27th July 2015) community meeting

Hi, We're going to have an IRC meeting today, 27th July, starting at 20:00 CEST (18:00 UTC) on #openvpn-devel irc.freenode.net. Current topic list along with basic information is here: If you have any other things you'd like to bri

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Does Openvpn really support cryptodev hardware accelerators

Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > >>>as our way to do --daemon wasn't compatible with cryptodev... > >do you mean it is suggested in daemon mode when running openvpn with > >cryptodev? > > > Gert's comment was about freebsd crypyodev support ... on Linux open

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Does Openvpn really support cryptodev hardware accelerators

Hi Jan, Thanks for your replay :) >>ah OK; I've grabbed a copy, built and installed it on 2 servers and ran some >>test: I get similar figures for 'openssl speed' but those numbers are >>artificial, i.e. they do not reflect true performance of the system. >>According to the site http://cryptodev