Re: [Openvpn-devel] getaddrinfo() confusion / way forward?

2014-04-08 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:49:20PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote: > Am 07.04.14 22:17, schrieb Gert Doering: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > >> A slightly simpler version of this could go to the beginning of > >> create_socket() (--> no ai_next chain walking nee

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Openvpn-devel Digest, Vol 95, Issue 3

2014-04-08 Thread randy bercheni
I do not know why you sent me this. I do not know you. Please do not e-mail me again. On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:31 PM, "openvpn-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net" wrote: Send Openvpn-devel mailing list submissions to     openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe v

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Seppänen
>>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 08.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Steffan Karger: > Perhaps a dumb question, but if the server instance is linked > against an older version of openssl (9.8.x), but the client is > compiled and linked against the vulnerable version, is it still an > issue for both sides,

[Openvpn-devel] unsubscribe

2014-04-08 Thread Rick Brockman
-- - _RICK BROCKMAN_ _28 LANCASTER ST._ _CHERRY VALLEY, NY 13320_ _607 264-8470_

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Seppänen
>> Hi, >> >> Am 08.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Steffan Karger: Perhaps a dumb question, but if the server instance is linked against an older version of openssl (9.8.x), but the client is compiled and linked against the vulnerable version, is it still an issue for both sides, or is

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:53:05PM +0200, Enno Gröper wrote: > Then OpenVPN should release new Windows Versions. Yeah, always glad to have people tell us what to do. Working on it... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Seppänen
> Hi, > > Am 08.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Steffan Karger: >>> Perhaps a dumb question, but if the server instance is linked >>> against an older version of openssl (9.8.x), but the client is >>> compiled and linked against the vulnerable version, is it still an >>> issue for both sides, or is the cli

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Enno Gröper
Hi, Am 08.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Steffan Karger: Perhaps a dumb question, but if the server instance is linked against an older version of openssl (9.8.x), but the client is compiled and linked against the vulnerable version, is it still an issue for both sides, or is the client going to leak pr

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 4/8/2014 10:13 AM, Steffan Karger wrote: On 08/04/2014 16:04, Mike Tancsa wrote: How does one attack the client ? In my case, the client only connects to my servers ? I use a tls-auth key file as well. If I understand correctly, the scenario would be the attacker would have to have the tls-au

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Steffan Karger
On 08/04/2014 16:04, Mike Tancsa wrote: > How does one attack the client ? In my case, the client only connects > to my servers ? I use a tls-auth key file as well. If I understand > correctly, the scenario would be the attacker would have to have the > tls-auth key file, and then do a man in the m

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 4/8/2014 9:42 AM, Steffan Karger wrote: Perhaps a dumb question, but if the server instance is linked against an older version of openssl (9.8.x), but the client is compiled and linked against the vulnerable version, is it still an issue for both sides, or is the client going to leak private

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Steffan Karger
Hi, On 08/04/2014 13:55, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 4/8/2014 7:47 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote: > >> Using the tls-auth option should protect against this vulnerability > (assuming that your tls-auth key is not known to the attacker). > > > >> If you're not using tls-auth and are using a vulnerable ver

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 4/8/2014 7:47 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote: Using the tls-auth option should protect against this vulnerability (assuming that your tls-auth key is not known to the attacker). If you're not using tls-auth and are using a vulnerable version of OpenSSL, you should definitely upgrade to OpenSSL

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Adriaan de Jong
-Original Message- From: Davide Brini [mailto:dave...@gmx.com] Sent: dinsdag 8 april 2014 13:26 To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed > On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:08:59 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > > I'm guessing that everyone has seen http://heart

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Davide Brini
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:08:59 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > I'm guessing that everyone has seen http://heartbleed.com/ by now. > > My question is simple: Could anyone confirm whether or not OpenVPN is > vulnerable (when linked to a vulnerable version of OpenSSL)? This is James' reply on the dev

[Openvpn-devel] Heartbleed

2014-04-08 Thread Tore Anderson
I'm guessing that everyone has seen http://heartbleed.com/ by now. My question is simple: Could anyone confirm whether or not OpenVPN is vulnerable (when linked to a vulnerable version of OpenSSL)? Tore