On 20/08/13 11:29, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:01:33PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>>> We've had questions on #openvpn-devel about pull request 7, which was the
>>> first time (on request *7*) that anyone was taking note that we offer
>>> pull requests at all - so th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/08/13 23:01, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:21:03PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>> I think we should keep the pull requests enabled. Even if we
>> don't merge the changes directly, they are a fairly lightweight
>> way to contr
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:01:33PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> > We've had questions on #openvpn-devel about pull request 7, which was the
> > first time (on request *7*) that anyone was taking note that we offer
> > pull requests at all - so there's 7 pull requests out there that are
> >
> Hi,
>
> (moving this to -devel)
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:21:03PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>> I think we should keep the pull requests enabled. Even if we don't merge
>> the changes directly, they are a fairly lightweight way to contribute.
>> If somebody sends a useful pull request (l
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:04:34PM +0600, ??? wrote:
> ok, I'll try to rewrite it in more elegant way.
> what's wrong with pull requests ? if someone doesn't like them, why to
> use github so ?
There's nothing wrong with pull requests per se, but it's not the way
the currently active
