Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Max Muster wrote:
> So maybe it would be a simple idea to think of a switch in "bug
> handling". Why not simply use this list as "#1 input" for bug reports.
This list isn't always working better or quicker... it really comes down
to whoever has time
Hi Gert,
schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 08:00:39PM +0200, Max Muster wrote:
>> please forgive me if I'm wrong, but there seems quite "little activity"
>> on bug tracking page from the developers.
>> E.g. one month ago I opened a bug report for a (suspected) bug present
>>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 08:00:39PM +0200, Max Muster wrote:
> please forgive me if I'm wrong, but there seems quite "little activity"
> on bug tracking page from the developers.
> E.g. one month ago I opened a bug report for a (suspected) bug present
> in file checking (bug #299) which is stil
Hi all,
please forgive me if I'm wrong, but there seems quite "little activity"
on bug tracking page from the developers.
E.g. one month ago I opened a bug report for a (suspected) bug present
in file checking (bug #299) which is still "new" and even not commented.
I don't want to be rude, but I
